Description and comparison of microscopic structures of Boletus pinophilus Pilat and Dermek. from different origins of Guatemala, with respect to those described for Europe.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54495/Rev.Cientifica.v19i2.160Keywords:
Boletus pinophilus, description, comparation, microscopic featuresAbstract
Guatemalan Boletus pinophilits samples were described macro and microscopically and compared with two Italian samples and with European bibliography to determine the right identification of them. Samples were also compared with Boletus rex-veris, arecently confirmed North American specie similar to B. pinophilus. There were found differences in form and size of cystidia. basidia and sterigmata number but the main difference was the form and size ol the cap hyphae. It’s concluded that B. pinophilus in Guatemala is a different entity of B. pinophilus sensu stricto, which grows in Europe, by the microscopic features found as well as its more intense flavor and thinner size. It's proposed the description of a new variety: Boletus pinophilus var, americanus var nov. R. Flores and G. Che.
Downloads
References
Arora D. California porcini: Three New Taxa, observations on their harvest, and the tragedy of No Commons. Economic Botany 2008: 62: 356-375, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-008-9050-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-008-9050-7
Betigelsdijk D. et al. A phylogenetic study of Boletus section Boletus in Europe. Persoonia 2008; 20: 1-7, https://doi.org/10.3767/003158508X283692 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3767/003158508X283692
Bessette E. et al. North American Boletos, a color guide to the fleshy pored mushrooms. New York: Syracuse University Press, 2000. 379 p. (87-172).
Bran M. et al. Contribución al conocimiento de los hongos comestibles de Guatemala. Revista Científica de la Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia 2003. 8-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54495/Rev.Cientifica.EdicionEspecial2003.232
Carranza I. Mueller G. Fungi of Costa Rica: selected studies on biodiversity and ecology. Rev Biol. 1996. 15-89.
Flores R. y Simonini G. Contributo alia conoscenza delle Boletalcs del Guatemala. RdM. 2000. 2:124-145.
Flores R. Lactarias sección Dapetes y Boletus grupo Edulis en Guatemala: micorrización y estudio filogon ético. España: Universidad de Murcia, (Tesis doctoral, Facultad de Biología) 2003. 232p. (14-27).
Foiera F. el al. Funghi Boleti. Bologna. Italia: Edagricolc. 1993. 260p. (100-101).
Galli G. I Boleti: Atlante pratico-monografico per la determinazione dci boleti. Italia: Edinatura. 1996. 287p. (162-165).
Hailing R. y Mueller G. Common Mushrooms of the Talamanca Mountains, Costa Rica. New York: The New York Botanical Garden. 2005. 179p. (34-78).
Metzler S. y Metzler V. Texas Mushrooms. A Field Guide. USA: University of Texas Press. 1992. 350p. (204-205). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7560/751262
Papetti C. Consiglio G, Simonin i G. Atlante fotográfico dei Funghi d'Italia. Italia: Associazione Micologica Bresadola, 1999, 511p. (369-384).
Pilát A, Dermek A. Boletaueae. Chiavi per le descrizioni sulla famigliaBoletaceae Maire. Vicenza. Italia: Gruppo Micologico Bresadola. 163p. (74-82).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 G. Che, R. Flores
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
