Trophic Niche Analysis of the Bat Community at Laguna Lachuá National Park, Guatemala: an Eco morphological Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54495/Rev.Cientifica.v24i1.102Keywords:
Eco morphological, trophic niche, bat, Laguna Lachuá National ParkAbstract
One way to classify and describe the trophic structure of a bat community is to identify groups of species based on the obtaining and utilization of trophic resources. Twenty four bat species were documented at Laguna Lachuá National Park, Cobán, Alta Verapaz, corresponding to 84% of the asymptote (28.45 species) estimated by the asymptotic Clench model. Food consumption could not be documented for three species. Hence, wing morphology and food items consumed were related only for 21 bat species in order to explore interspecific morphological and ecological relationships within the assemblage. The species were grouped in four functional ensembles supported by the principal component analysis of the wing parameters (wing loading, aspect ratio, wing tip shape index) and diet: narrow-space aerial insectivorous (4 species), gleaning insectivorous (4 species), carnivores (1 species) and frugivorous (12 species). The resource partitioning in the frugivorous species is mainly given by the food consumption; all the species in this group has similar characteristics and capability of flight, with smooth differences on flight speed and maneuverability. Most of the species fed primarily on four plant genera: Piper, Ficus, Cecropia and Vismia. Fruit consumption reveals a group of species that fed mainly on Piper and Vismia and other group that fed mainly on Ficus and Cecropia (≥ 0.5). In contrast, the resource partitioning in the insectivorous species is mainly given by the foraging strategy; the food consumption in this group does not reveal any particular pattern. Most of the species fed primarily on coleopterans, supporting their diets with other less common items. The results indicate that different foraging strategies and trophic selection allows the coexistence within species and plays a great role in the structure of local bat communities.
Downloads
References
Aguirre L. (2002). A structure of neotropical savanna bat community. Journal of Mammalogy, 83: 775-784. https://doi.org/10.1644/1545-1542(2002)083<0775:SOANSB>2.0.CO;2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1644/1545-1542(2002)083<0775:SOANSB>2.0.CO;2
Arita H. (1997). Species composition and morphological structure of the bat fauna of Yucatán, México. Journal of Animal Ecology, 66, 83-97. https://doi.org/10.2307/5967 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/5967
Fenton M.,Acharya, L., Audet, D., Hickey, M., Merriman, C., Obrist, M., Syme, D. y Adkins, B. (1992). Phyllostomid bats (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) as indicators of habitat disruption in the Neotropics. Biotropica, 24, 440-446. https://doi.org/10.2307/2388615 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2388615
Fleming T. (1986). The structure of neotropical bat communities: a preliminary analysis. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 59, 135-150
Giannini N. y Kalko E. (2004). Trophic structure in a large assemblage of phyllostomids bats in Panama. Oikos, 105, 209-220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12690.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12690.x
Jiménez A. y Hortal J. (2003). Las curvas de acumulación de especies y la necesidad de evaluar la calidad de los inventarios ecológicos. Revista Ibérica de Aracnología. Zaragoza, España. 8, 151-161.
Kalko E. (1998). Organization and diversity of tropical bat communities through space and time. Zoology, 101, 281-297.
Krebs C. (1998). Ecological Methodology. Segunda edición. Addison Wesley Press. U.S.
McCarthy, T. J. y S. G. Pérez. (2006). Land and freshwater mammals of Guatemala: faunal documentation and diversity. Cano, E. (ed.) En: Biodiversidad de Guatemala. Universidad del Valle de Guatemala. Guatemala.
Moreno C. y Halffter G. (2000). Assessing the completness of bat biodiversity inventories using species accumulation curves. British Ecological Society. Journal of Applied Ecology. 37, 149-158. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00483.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00483.x
Moreno, C. (2001). Métodos para medir la biodiversidad. Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo. México.
Norberg, U., y Rayner, J. (1987). Ecological morphology and flight in bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera): Wing adaptations, flight performance, foraging strategy and Echolocation. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 316, 335-427. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1987.0030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1987.0030
Pérez, S., López, J. y McCarthy T. (2012). Five New records of bats for Guatemala, with comments on the check list of the country. Chiroptera Neotropical, 18, 1106-1110.
Pianka E. (1973). The structure of lizard communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 53-74. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000413 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000413
Quinn G. y Keought M. (2002). Experimental design and data analysis for biologist. Cambridge University Press. N.Y. USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806384
Sampaio E., Kalko E., Bernard E., Rodríguez B. y Handley Ch. (2003). A biodiversity assessment of bats in a tropical lowland rainforest of central Amazonia, including methodological and conservation considerations. Studies of Neotropical Fauna and Environment, 38, 17-31. https://doi.org/10.1076/snfe.38.1.17.14035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1076/snfe.38.1.17.14035
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 L. Trujillo, J. López
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
